The ruling holds that a company that designs, trains, operates, and manages an AI system must assume legal liability for any damages caused by the responses it generates.

I doubt this will be the last time an AI getting it wrong results in legal repercussions.

“When outrageous, false statements are made that force innocent defendants to spend many hundreds of thousands of dollars to litigate and prove them false, there must be severe sanctions.” For better ...

Generally speaking, the law can't punish false statements about the government—even knowing lies—on the grounds that they damage the government's reputation. In the words of New York Times v. Sullivan ...

Dear PAO, I intend to file a criminal case against a witness who lied on the witness stand during an Action for Specific Performance in which I was involved. His false statements severely affected my ...

These questions of negotiation ethics implicate ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 4.1(a), which prohibits a lawyer from knowingly making a "false statement of material fact" to a third person, ...

If you tell your partner that you spent $100 on a rare bobblehead for your office, when the full price was actually $1,000, have you said anything false? Literally, you did spend $100; you just spent ...